[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <985e9f80-3457-abab-d269-c1692e1bee8c@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:07:24 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2 net-next
On 1/15/18 8:29 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> About the branches - what should we base our patches on for net-next?
> Most -next repos just use the master, but it seems that in case of
> iproute2-next.git the net-next branch is still active, and there is
> an inactive net-next branch in iproute2.git.. Is this transitional or
> will it stay this way?
The master branch for iproute2-next tree has been updated to be the
branch for -next patches and the net-next branch has been deleted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists