[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180122164304.GC23171@axis.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:43:04 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
To: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
jpinto@...opsys.com, joabreu@...opsys.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: stmmac smatch error rx_queue_routing
Hello stmmac peeps,
I found this smatch error:
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c:132 dwmac4_tx_queue_routing() error:
buffer overflow 'route_possibilities' 5 <= 254
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c:133 dwmac4_tx_queue_routing() error:
buffer overflow 'route_possibilities' 5 <= 254
Looking at the code raises some questions:
static void dwmac4_tx_queue_routing(struct mac_device_info *hw,
u8 packet, u32 queue)
{
...
static const struct stmmac_rx_routing route_possibilities[] = {
{ GMAC_RXQCTRL_AVCPQ_MASK, GMAC_RXQCTRL_AVCPQ_SHIFT },
{ GMAC_RXQCTRL_PTPQ_MASK, GMAC_RXQCTRL_PTPQ_SHIFT },
{ GMAC_RXQCTRL_DCBCPQ_MASK, GMAC_RXQCTRL_DCBCPQ_SHIFT },
{ GMAC_RXQCTRL_UPQ_MASK, GMAC_RXQCTRL_UPQ_SHIFT },
{ GMAC_RXQCTRL_MCBCQ_MASK, GMAC_RXQCTRL_MCBCQ_SHIFT },
};
value = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL1);
/* routing configuration */
value &= ~route_possibilities[packet - 1].reg_mask;
value |= (queue << route_possibilities[packet-1].reg_shift) &
route_possibilities[packet - 1].reg_mask;
Calling the function with e.g. packet == 0 will lead to interesting stuff,
so the smatch warning is absolutely warranted.
Looking where this function is used:
static const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
...
.rx_queue_routing = dwmac4_tx_queue_routing,
Mixing rx and tx.. is this really correct?
Looking where the rx_queue_routing function is used:
git grep rx_queue_routing
stmmac_main.c: if (rx_queues_count > 1 && priv->hw->mac->rx_queue_routing)
it is just referenced in a single place, and we only check if function is
non-NULL, we never even call the function, so right now it is just unused
code.
Regards,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists