[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dcd4ad7-680b-f8b8-2503-06646619f24d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:40:22 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 2/8] ipaddress: Use get_addr_rta()
On 1/22/18 10:26 AM, Serhey Popovych wrote:
> diff --git a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c
> index ba60125..38d994e 100644
> --- a/ip/ipaddress.c
> +++ b/ip/ipaddress.c
> @@ -1523,19 +1523,20 @@ int print_addrinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> if (fnmatch(filter.label, label, 0) != 0)
> return 0;
> }
> - if (filter.pfx.family) {
> - if (rta_tb[IFA_LOCAL]) {
> - inet_prefix dst = { .family = ifa->ifa_family };
> -
> - memcpy(&dst.data, RTA_DATA(rta_tb[IFA_LOCAL]), RTA_PAYLOAD(rta_tb[IFA_LOCAL]));
> - if (inet_addr_match(&dst, &filter.pfx, filter.pfx.bitlen))
> - return 0;
> - }
> - }
>
> if (filter.family && filter.family != ifa->ifa_family)
> return 0;
>
> + if (filter.pfx.family && rta_tb[IFA_LOCAL]) {
> + struct rtattr *rta = rta_tb[IFA_LOCAL];
> + inet_prefix dst, *f_pfx = &filter.pfx;
> +
> + if (get_addr_rta(&dst, rta, f_pfx->family))
> + return 0;
> + if (inet_addr_match(&dst, f_pfx, f_pfx->bitlen))
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Those 2 checks are a consistent them throughout the patches. Given that
why not create a helper that takes an rta and an inet_prefix and returns
the result of both checks?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists