lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df3fc194-cd03-0d96-9bf8-112aa283a74f@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:16:35 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: test_maps: cleanup sockmaps when test ends

On 01/23/2018 06:18 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 09:01 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:55:30PM +0900, Prashant Bhole wrote:
>>> On 1/23/2018 1:38 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:30:44PM +0900, Prashant Bhole wrote:
>>>>> Bug: BPF programs and maps related to sockmaps test exist in
>>>>> memory even after test_maps ends
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes it by empyting sockmaps when test ends.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 6f6d33f3b3d0f ("bpf: selftests add sockmap tests")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
>>>>
>>>> that's a fine workaround and I'm planning to apply this patch
>>>> to bpf-next, but it's not a fix. The sockmap should have cleaned
>>>> itself up.

Agree, this definitely needs kernel side fixing.

>>> Ok. Do I need to re-submit it targeted to -bpf-next and without fixes tag?
>>
>> No need. It's fine.
> 
> Also I'm looking over sockmap code now for the bug, should have
> something shortly.
> 
> Agree this is a nice cleanup of the test code though. On the other
> hand I should add some explicit tests for this case (deleting map
> with elements) as well though.

Ok, thanks for looking into fixing it! The latter could be added along
with test case for the fix.

I've tested and applied Prashant's patch to bpf-next with a note that
real fix is still TBD. Thanks for catching Prashant!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ