[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0eeJKAOZjJ-XVQwLOCuVzSqdUtCaS4F90zZ=WvRQ8sBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 12:13:45 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>
Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/36] nds32: Signal handling support
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com> wrote:
> 2018-01-18 18:30 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>>> From: Greentime Hu <greentime@...estech.com>
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for signal handling.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime@...estech.com>
>>
>> I never feel qualified enough to properly review signal handling code, so
>> no Ack from me for this code even though I don't see anything wrong with it.
>> Hopefully someone else can give an Ack after looking more closely.
>>
>
> Dear Arnd:
>
> We'd be glad to improve signal handling code to meet your requirement.
> Could you
> tell us which part we need to refine or which implementation is good
> for us to refer?
No, as I said, the problem is on my side, I just don't understand enough of it.
I would assume that the arm64 and risc-v implementations are the most
thoroughly reviewed, but haven't looked at those in enough detail either.
If your code does something that risc-v doesn't do, try to understand whether
there should be a difference or not.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists