netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf, doc: Correct one wrong value in "Register value tracking"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6e5c822e-af23-7a92-4dd8-b152e20cb6b7@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:44:06 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, doc: Correct one wrong value in "Register value
 tracking"

On 01/24/2018 08:48 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> If we then OR this with 0x40, then the value of 6th bit (0th is first bit)
> become known, so the right mask is 0xbf instead of 0xcf.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>

Applied to bpf-next, thanks Wang!