netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net/ipv6: Do not allow route add with a device that is down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1516814614.3715.24.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:23:34 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net/ipv6: Do not allow route add with a
 device that is down

On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 08:29 -0800, David Ahern wrote:
> IPv6 allows routes to be installed when the device is not up (admin up).
> Worse, it does not mark it as LINKDOWN. IPv4 does not allow it and really
> there is no reason for IPv6 to allow it, so check the flags and deny if
> device is admin down.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> ---
> v2
> - missed setting err to -ENETDOWN (thanks for catching that Roopa)
> 
>  net/ipv6/route.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index f85da2f1e729..4e8fab766018 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -2734,6 +2734,12 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
>  	if (!dev)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	err = -ENETDOWN;
> +	if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device is not up");
> +		goto out;
> +	}


Note that since you have to take a branch, you can move the 
err = -ENETDOWN inside the branch.

The trick of setting err before doing :

if (cond)
   goto xxxx;

Is only relevant if the goto is naked.

By looking at your patch without more context, it is not clear that the
"err = -ENETDOWN" has no side effect.