lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180125000007.dbg536a7ncstpoqc@salvia>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 01:00:07 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     eyal.birger@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, shmulik@...anetworks.com,
        eyal@...anetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: sched: add em_ipt ematch for calling
 xtables matches

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:37:16PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:17:32 +0200
> 
> > +	network_offset = skb_network_offset(skb);
> > +	skb_pull(skb, network_offset);
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > +	if (skb->skb_iif)
> > +		indev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(em->net, skb->skb_iif);
> > +
> > +	nf_hook_state_init(&state, im->hook, im->nfproto, indev ?: skb->dev,
> > +			   skb->dev, NULL, em->net, NULL);
> > +
> > +	acpar.match = im->match;
> > +	acpar.matchinfo = im->match_data;
> > +	acpar.state = &state;
> > +
> > +	ret = im->match->match(skb, &acpar);
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > +	skb_push(skb, network_offset);
> 
> If the SKB is shared in any way, this pull/push around the NF hook
> invocation is illegal.

At ingress, skb->data points to the network header, which is what the
xtables matches expect, so these are actually noops, therefore,
skb_pull() and skb_push() can be removed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ