lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180125141515.GB16547@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:15:15 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com>
Cc:     timur@...eaurora.org, hpuranik@...eaurora.org,
        yu.zheng@...-semitech.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: qcom/emac: mdiobus-dev fwnode should point to
 emac-adev

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:14:39PM -0800, Wang Dongsheng wrote:
> mdiobus always try to get a GPIO "reset" consumer, based on ACPI
> the GPIO should be described in emac-adev _DSD or _CRS.
> 
> ACPI uses mido common API to register, however mdio->dev->fwnode is not
> pointing to any adev. So the "reset" consumer can never be found.
> 
> OF has done this by using an of_mdiobus_register. The mdiobus get emac
> of_node and go through the of_node to find a GPIO "reset" consumer.
> 
> Not sure, ACPI needs to add the same API for mdio just like OF because
> mdio isn't a real entity in ACPI. So I think there isn't any work in
> ACPI, the mac driver needs to take adev to mdiobus when mido-bus is
> registering.

Hi Wang

People are working on an ACPI description for MDIO. There have been
some discussion about this in the thread "Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI
support".

If i'm reading your patch correctly, you are looking for the MDIO
reset in the MAC node. This is wrong. It is an MDIO property, so
should be in the MDIO device. Once we have figured out how to
represent MDIO busses in ACPI, the reset will be in the MDIO node.

I don't recommend you do this. It will mean your device is different
to every other device using ACPI for MDIO. A better approach is to
take part in the discussion about how to represent MDIO busses and
PHYs in ACPI.

     Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ