[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180125023712.3038949-2-brakmo@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:37:01 -0800
From: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>, Blake Matheny <bmatheny@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/12] bpf: Only reply field should be writeable
Currently, a sock_ops BPF program can write the op field and all the
reply fields (reply and replylong). This is a bug. The op field should
not have been writeable and there is currently no way to use replylong
field for indices >= 1. This patch enforces that only the reply field
(which equals replylong[0]) is writeable.
Fixes: 40304b2a1567 ("bpf: BPF support for sock_ops")
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
---
net/core/filter.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 18da42a..bf9bb75 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -3845,8 +3845,7 @@ static bool sock_ops_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
{
if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
switch (off) {
- case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, op) ...
- offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, replylong[3]):
+ case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, reply):
break;
default:
return false;
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists