netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 2/2] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180126185617-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:58:50 +0200
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Cc:     stephen@...workplumber.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, kubakici@...pl
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 2/2] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF
 datapath when available

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:58:39PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> @@ -2859,6 +3123,42 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_net_driver = {
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +static int virtio_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
> +			       unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *event_dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
> +
> +	/* Skip our own events */
> +	if (event_dev->netdev_ops == &virtnet_netdev)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	/* Avoid non-Ethernet type devices */
> +	if (event_dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	/* Avoid Vlan dev with same MAC registering as VF */
> +	if (is_vlan_dev(event_dev))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	/* Avoid Bonding master dev with same MAC registering as VF */
> +	if ((event_dev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING) &&
> +	    (event_dev->flags & IFF_MASTER))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	switch (event) {
> +	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> +		return virtnet_register_vf(event_dev);
> +	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> +		return virtnet_unregister_vf(event_dev);
> +	default:
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block virtio_netdev_notifier = {
> +	.notifier_call = virtio_netdev_event,
> +};
> +
>  static __init int virtio_net_driver_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -2877,6 +3177,8 @@ static __init int virtio_net_driver_init(void)
>          ret = register_virtio_driver(&virtio_net_driver);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_virtio;
> +
> +	register_netdevice_notifier(&virtio_netdev_notifier);
>  	return 0;
>  err_virtio:
>  	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(CPUHP_VIRT_NET_DEAD);
> @@ -2889,6 +3191,7 @@ module_init(virtio_net_driver_init);
>  
>  static __exit void virtio_net_driver_exit(void)
>  {
> +	unregister_netdevice_notifier(&virtio_netdev_notifier);
>  	unregister_virtio_driver(&virtio_net_driver);
>  	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(CPUHP_VIRT_NET_DEAD);
>  	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(virtionet_online);

I have a question here: what if PT device driver module loads
and creates a device before virtio?


> -- 
> 2.14.3