netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/12] bpf: More sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180126005437.2rzbypi3mlqj6a33@ast-mbp>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:54:39 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Blake Matheny <bmatheny@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/12] bpf: More sock_ops callbacks

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:14:04PM -0800, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> This patchset adds support for:
> 
> - direct R or R/W access to many tcp_sock fields
> - passing up to 4 arguments to sock_ops BPF functions
> - tcp_sock field bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags for controlling callbacks
> - optionally calling sock_ops BPF program when RTO fires
> - optionally calling sock_ops BPF program when packet is retransmitted
> - optionally calling sock_ops BPF program when TCP state changes
> - access to tclass and sk_txhash
> - new selftest
> 
> v2: Fixed commit message 0/11. The commit is to "bpf-next" but the patch
>     below used "bpf" and Patchwork didn't work correctly.
> v3: Cleaned RTO callback as per  Yuchung's comment
>     Added BPF enum for TCP states as per  Alexei's comment
> v4: Fixed compile warnings related to detecting changes between TCP
>     internal states and the BPF defined states.
> v5: Fixed comment issues in some selftest files
>     Fixed accesss issue with u64 fields in bpf_sock_ops struct
> v6: Made fixes based on comments form Eric Dumazet:
>     The field bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags was addded in a hole on 64bit kernels
>     Field bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags is now set through a helper function
>     which returns an error when a BPF program tries to set bits for
>     callbacks that are not supported in the current kernel.
>     Added a comment indicating that when adding fields to bpf_sock_ops_kern
>     they should be added before the field named "temp" if they need to be
>     cleared before calling the BPF function.  
> v7: Enfornced fields "op" and "replylong[1] .. replylong[3]" not be writable
>     based on comments form Eric Dumazet and Alexei Starovoitov.
>     Filled 32 bit hole in bpf_sock_ops struct with sk_txhash based on
>     comments from Daniel Borkmann.
>     Removed unused functions (tcp_call_bpf_1arg, tcp_call_bpf_4arg) based
>     on comments from Daniel Borkmann.
> v8: Add commit message 00/12
>     Add Acked-by as appropriate
> v9: Moved the bug fix to the front of the patchset
>     Changed RETRANS_CB so it is always called (before it was only called if
>     the retransmit succeeded). It is now called with an extra argument, the
>     return value of tcp_transmit_skb (0 => success). Based on comments
>     from Yuchung Cheng.
>     Added support for reading 2 new fields, sacked_out and lost_out, based on
>     comments from Yuchung Cheng.
> v10: Moved the callback flags from include/uapi/linux/tcp.h to
>      include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>      Cleaned up the test in selftest. Added a timeout so it always completes,
>      even if the client is not communicating with the server. Made it faster
>      by removing the sleeps. Made sure it works even when called back-to-back
>      20 times.

Applied to bpf-next, thank you Larry.

We'll make sure to send patch 1 to stable when 4.15 is released.

Also there were few leftover comments in patch 12,
please clean it up in the followup patch.

Thanks