lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180126223348.11250-14-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:33:48 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     ast@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others

Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new
test cases.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c                              |   8 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index e3938e3..4cd9ea9 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -2003,10 +2003,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ { 4, 0 }, { 5, 10 } }
 	},
 	{
-		"INT: DIV by zero",
+		/* This one doesn't go through verifier, but is just raw insn
+		 * as opposed to cBPF tests from here. Thus div by 0 tests are
+		 * done in test_verifier in BPF kselftests.
+		 */
+		"INT: DIV by -1",
 		.u.insns_int = {
 			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R6, R1),
-			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, 0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, -1),
 			BPF_LD_ABS(BPF_B, 3),
 			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, R0, R7),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 9e7075b..697bd83 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <sched.h>
+#include <limits.h>
 
 #include <sys/capability.h>
 #include <sys/resource.h>
@@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 2",
@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"DIV64 by 0, zero check",
@@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 1",
@@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 2",
@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"MOD64 by 0, zero check",
@@ -171,13 +172,245 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 42,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check ok, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 8,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 1, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 2, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 by 0, zero check, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check ok, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 2,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 1, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 2, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 by 0, zero check 1, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 2,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 by 0, zero check 2, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = -1,
+	},
+	/* Just make sure that JITs used udiv/umod as otherwise we get
+	 * an exception from INT_MIN/-1 overflow similarly as with div
+	 * by zero.
+	 */
+	{
+		"DIV32 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
 		.retval = 0,
 	},
 	{
+		"MOD32 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = INT_MIN,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = INT_MIN,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, -1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"xor32 zero extend check",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 32),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, 0xffff),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_2, 0, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
 		"empty prog",
 		.insns = {
 		},
-		.errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -374,7 +607,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = REJECT,
-		.errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode c4",
 	},
 	{
 		"arsh32 on reg",
@@ -385,7 +618,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = REJECT,
-		.errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode cc",
 	},
 	{
 		"arsh64 on imm",
@@ -501,7 +734,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X, 0, 0, 0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "BPF_CALL uses reserved",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode 8d",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -691,7 +924,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "invalid BPF_LD_IMM",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -709,7 +942,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(-1, 0, 0, 0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "invalid BPF_ALU opcode f0",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode ff",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -718,7 +951,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(-1, -1, -1, -1, -1),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "invalid BPF_ALU opcode f0",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode ff",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -7543,7 +7776,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			},
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "BPF_END uses reserved fields",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode d7",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -8964,6 +9197,90 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.retval = 1,
 	},
 	{
+		"calls: div by 0 in subprog",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"calls: multiple ret types in subprog 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
+	},
+	{
+		"calls: multiple ret types in subprog 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9),
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 64),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.fixup_map1 = { 16 },
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
+	},
+	{
 		"calls: overlapping caller/callee",
 		.insns = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 0),
-- 
2.9.5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ