netdev - Re: [net-next 0/8][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2018-01-24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180129.114604.1053082691513892361.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:46:04 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc:     jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 0/8][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver
 Updates 2018-01-24

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:29:42 -0800

> I'll double check our VF drivers and make sure none of them are
> exposing a netdevice with an all 0's MAC address, and see what we can
> do about relocating the locally administered address generation into
> the PF.

If such netdevs are never exposed with all 0's MACs, then I'm happy.

Thanks for the explanation.