[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180131.102039.130340676906752608.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:20:39 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amonakov@...ras.ru
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: pxa168_eth: add netconsole support
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:05:47 +0300 (MSK)
> And is this a matter of efficiency (not calling napi_schedule when there's
> nothing to do and not keeping interrupts enabled for its duration), or also
> a matter of correctness?
If you don't mask interrupts properly around scheduling and finishing
NAPI poll, you can lose events so it is a matter of correctness.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists