lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180201.101655.1316424669256047119.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:16:55 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     guro@...com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, edumazet@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: memcontrol: charge allocated memory after
 mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()

From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:54:08 +0000

> So I really start thinking that reverting 9f1c2674b328
> ("net: memcontrol: defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()")
> and fixing the original issue differently might be easier
> and a proper way to go. Does it makes sense?

You'll need to work that out with Eric Dumazet who added the
change in question which you think we should revert.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ