[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180205225505.GA15427@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 23:55:05 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net v2] xt_RATEEST: acquire xt_rateest_mutex for hash
insert
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> rateest_hash is supposed to be protected by xt_rateest_mutex,
> and, as suggested by Eric, lookup and insert should be atomic,
> so we should acquire the xt_rateest_mutex once for both.
>
> So introduce a non-locking helper for internal use and keep the
> locking one for external.
Looks good, thanks Cong.
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists