[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180206091247.6fe32f37@xeon-e3>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:12:47 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] ip netns: allow negative nsid
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:16:15 +0100
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> wrote:
> If the kernel receives a negative nsid it will automatically assign the
> next available nsid. In this case alloc_netid() will set min and max to
> 0 for ird_alloc(). And when max == 0 idr_alloc() will interpret this as
> the maxium range, i.e. specific to nsids it will try to find an id in
> the range [0,INT_MAX). This is intentionally supported in the kernel for
> nsids. Commit acbe9118ce8086f765ffb0da15f80c7c01a8903a regressed ip
> netns in that respect although previously the use-case was either
> accidentally supported or opaquely supported such that it triggered the
> original commit. From what I can gather it went as follows before:
> atoi() was called with a string indicating a negative value which caused
> it to return -1 which was passed to the kernel. Let's make it less
> opaque and use get_integer() and set to -1 when a negative nsid was
> requested. This restores the old behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Rather than negative value, it would be better from user interface
point of view to use a user readable value like "auto" which encapsulates
the kernel behavior.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists