Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ahGbrH9BGFeAfRW08jJEWfWf7ovzP9vsHZVQ4-KM5hTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:00:55 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+63682ce11532e0da2b9d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in rtnl_lock (3)

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:58 PM, syzbot
<syzbot+63682ce11532e0da2b9d@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on net-next commit
> 617aebe6a97efa539cc4b8a52adccd89596e6be0 (Sun Feb 4 00:25:42 2018 +0000)
> Merge tag 'usercopy-v4.16-rc1' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
>
> So far this crash happened 2510 times on net-next, upstream.
> C reproducer is attached.
> syzkaller reproducer is attached.
> Raw console output is attached.
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
> .config is attached.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+63682ce11532e0da2b9d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for
> details.
> If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.


Paolo, was this also fixed by "netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock
lock only in the required scope"?


> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 4.15.0+ #221 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syzkaller414214/4173 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000003cc93f9b>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
> net/core/rtnetlink.c:74
>
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000059cfac75>]
> xt_find_table_lock+0x3e/0x3e0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:1041
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #2 (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.}:
>        __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
>        __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
>        mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
>        xt_find_table_lock+0x3e/0x3e0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:1041
>        xt_request_find_table_lock+0x28/0xc0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:1088
>        get_info+0x154/0x690 net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:989
>        do_ipt_get_ctl+0x159/0xac0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1699
>        nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:104 [inline]
>        nf_getsockopt+0x6a/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:122
>        ip_getsockopt+0x15c/0x220 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1571
>        tcp_getsockopt+0x82/0xd0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:3359
>        sock_common_getsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2934
>        SYSC_getsockopt net/socket.c:1880 [inline]
>        SyS_getsockopt+0x178/0x340 net/socket.c:1862
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0
>
> -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}:
>        lock_sock_nested+0xc2/0x110 net/core/sock.c:2777
>        lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1463 [inline]
>        do_ip_setsockopt.isra.12+0x1d9/0x3210 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:646
>        ip_setsockopt+0x3a/0xa0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1252
>        udp_setsockopt+0x45/0x80 net/ipv4/udp.c:2401
>        sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2975
>        SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1849 [inline]
>        SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1828
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0
>
> -> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}:
>        lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
>        __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
>        __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
>        mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
>        rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:74
>        unregister_netdevice_notifier+0x91/0x4e0 net/core/dev.c:1673
>        clusterip_config_entry_put net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c:114
> [inline]
>        clusterip_tg_destroy+0x389/0x6e0
> net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c:518
>        cleanup_entry+0x218/0x350 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:654
>        __do_replace+0x79d/0xa50 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1089
>        do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1145 [inline]
>        do_ipt_set_ctl+0x40f/0x5f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1675
>        nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline]
>        nf_setsockopt+0x67/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115
>        ip_setsockopt+0x97/0xa0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1259
>        tcp_setsockopt+0x82/0xd0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2905
>        sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2975
>        SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1849 [inline]
>        SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1828
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
>   rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &xt[i].mutex
>
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&xt[i].mutex);
>                                lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
>                                lock(&xt[i].mutex);
>   lock(rtnl_mutex);
>
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by syzkaller414214/4173:
>  #0:  (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000059cfac75>]
> xt_find_table_lock+0x3e/0x3e0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:1041
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 4173 Comm: syzkaller414214 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #221
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
> Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:53
>  print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x2cd/0x2dc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223
>  check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline]
>  check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline]
>  validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
>  __lock_acquire+0x30a8/0x3e00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431
>  lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
>  __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
>  __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
>  mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
>  rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:74
>  unregister_netdevice_notifier+0x91/0x4e0 net/core/dev.c:1673
>  clusterip_config_entry_put net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c:114 [inline]
>  clusterip_tg_destroy+0x389/0x6e0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c:518
>  cleanup_entry+0x218/0x350 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:654
>  __do_replace+0x79d/0xa50 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1089
>  do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1145 [inline]
>  do_ipt_set_ctl+0x40f/0x5f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1675
>  nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline]
>  nf_setsockopt+0x67/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115
>  ip_setsockopt+0x97/0xa0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1259
>  tcp_setsockopt+0x82/0xd0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2905
>  sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2975
>  SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1849 [inline]
>  SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1828
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0
> RIP: 0033:0x4443da
> RSP: 002b:00007ffe9e2704d8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006cc100 RCX: 00000000004443da
> RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00000000006cc100 R08: 00000000000002d8 R09: 000000000106b880
> R10: 00000000006cc528 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000003
> R13: 00000000006cf0a8 R14: 00000000006cf050 R15: 00000000004a338e
>
>
> ---
> This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
> Direct all questions to syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
> If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is
> merged
> into any tree, please reply to this email with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
> If you want to test a patch for this bug, please reply with:
> #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch
> and provide the patch inline or as an attachment.
> To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
> If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
> #syz invalid
> Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug
> report.
> Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "syzkaller-bugs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/94eb2c07fd4c75cd8705648eeb87%40google.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists