[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180206125507.GA25595@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:55:07 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling"
> Maybe a better solution now would be to restore phy_resume()'s lock-
> taking behaviour, and provide a lockless __phy_resume() which can be
> used internally within phylib. This means drivers using phy_resume()
> would see no change. Maybe something like (untested):
Hi Russell
I was thinking the same, and have a pretty much identical untested
patch. This gets things 'fixed' and we can then later come back and
look at the overall architecture.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists