[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1518027334-9814-1-git-send-email-naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 23:45:34 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shuahkh@....samsung.com, daniel@...earbox.net, shuah@...nel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, ast@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
Two cases to be addressed here,
In the development process of test_bpf.c unit testing will be done by
developers by using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko"
On the other hand testers run full tests by installing modules on device
under test (DUT) and followed by modprobe to insert the modules accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
index ed4774d..35669cc 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
@@ -10,9 +10,21 @@ test_run()
echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
dmesg -C
- insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
- if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
- rc=1
+ if [ -f ${SRC_TREE}/lib/test_bpf.ko ]; then
+ insmod ${SRC_TREE}/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
+ if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+ rc=1
+ fi
+ else
+ # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
+ if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
+ echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
+ elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
+ echo "test_bpf: ok"
+ else
+ echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
+ rc=1
+ fi
fi
rmmod test_bpf 2> /dev/null
dmesg | grep FAIL
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists