[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXkmSPGXfbOyLH-BMT+_u4MfEG+y78H5JNr9x1i=nNTJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:08:36 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Subject: Re: Fwd: u32 ht filters
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 06:09:15AM CET, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>>Hi, Jiri
>>
>>Your commit 7fa9d974f3c2a016b9accb18f4ee2ed2a738585c
>>breaks the tc script by Paweł. Please find below for details.
>
> Did you do the bisection?
> The commit just uses block struct instead of q, but since they
> are in 1:1 relation, that should be equvivalent. So basically you still
> have per-qdisc hashtables for u32.
Well, at least the following fixes the problem here. But I am not sure
if it is expected too for shared block among multiple qdiscs.
@@ -338,7 +330,7 @@ static struct hlist_head *tc_u_common_hash;
static unsigned int tc_u_hash(const struct tcf_proto *tp)
{
- return hash_ptr(tp->chain->block, U32_HASH_SHIFT);
+ return hash_ptr(tp->chain->block->q, U32_HASH_SHIFT);
}
static struct tc_u_common *tc_u_common_find(const struct tcf_proto *tp)
@@ -348,7 +340,7 @@ static struct tc_u_common *tc_u_common_find(const
struct tcf_proto *tp)
h = tc_u_hash(tp);
hlist_for_each_entry(tc, &tc_u_common_hash[h], hnode) {
- if (tc->block == tp->chain->block)
+ if (tc->block->q == tp->chain->block->q)
return tc;
}
return NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists