[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <911a16d7-e210-2c12-e8ec-7c6ed055bfe4@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:20:19 +0200
From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 4/6] iptunnel/ip6tunnel: Code cleanups
David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/6/18 7:16 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 2/2/18 6:10 AM, Serhey Popovych wrote:
>>> @@ -414,15 +428,18 @@ static int do_tunnels_list(struct ip_tunnel_parm *p)
>>> fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get type of \"%s\"\n", name);
>>> continue;
>>> }
>>> - if (type != ARPHRD_TUNNEL && type != ARPHRD_IPGRE && type != ARPHRD_SIT)
>>> + switch (type) {
>>> + case ARPHRD_TUNNEL:
>>> + case ARPHRD_IPGRE:
>>> + case ARPHRD_SIT:
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> continue;
>>> + }
>>> + memset(p1, 0, sizeof(p1));
>>
>> Shouldn't that be &p1 for the first arg? I get a compile failure:
>>
>> ip
>> CC iptunnel.o
>> CC ip6tunnel.o
>> iptunnel.c: In function ‘do_tunnels_list’:
>> iptunnel.c:439:10: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of ‘memset’
>> memset(p1, 0, sizeof(p1));
>> ^~
>> In file included from iptunnel.c:15:0:
>> /usr/include/string.h:62:14: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
>> type ‘struct ip_tunnel_parm’
>> extern void *memset (void *__s, int __c, size_t __n) __THROW __nonnull
>> ((1));
>> ^~~~~~
>> ../config.mk:48: recipe for target 'iptunnel.o' failed
>>
>
> Fixed by patch 5 which deletes do_tunnels_list. So why have a cleanup
> patch that changes code you then delete?
>
There at least two reasons:
1) Abstract tunnel matching code into a function that will be used as
callback ->match() in upcoming change.
2) Make do_tunnels_list() ip and ipv6 variants diff contain only
real differences to show upcoming change where common
do_tunnels_list() introduced is correct.
Will update comment for this patch in v2.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists