[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGRGNgXc+GLXmTBVcj-PiZ2MRtUF3HvaZ7a4zgQux0yzEqpLdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 22:59:56 +1100
From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sun: Add SPDX license tags to Sun network drivers
Hi Shannon,
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Shannon Nelson
<shannon.nelson@...cle.com> wrote:
> Add the appropriate SPDX license tags to the Sun network drivers
> as outlined in Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/ldmvsw.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunbmac.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sungem.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunqe.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet_common.c | 1 +
> 11 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig
> index b2caf51..7b982e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #
> # Sun network device configuration
> #
I'm not sure that Kconfig files count as source, right?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.c
> index 113bd57..9020b08 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /* cassini.c: Sun Microsystems Cassini(+) ethernet driver.
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2004 Sun Microsystems Inc.
I understand that this is the specified way to do this, but it's
exceptionally ugly.
Also, shouldn't the SPDX line _replace_ the usual "this program is
free software" license paragraphs? My understanding is that the SPDX
line is functionally equivalent to having the terms spelled out.
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists