netdev - Re: [PATCH] sctp: verify size of a new chunk in _sctp_make

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3136bfa1-2edc-08b7-e8c1-c7eb8020919b@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:05:37 +0300
From:   Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@...cle.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: verify size of a new chunk in _sctp_make_chunk()

On 09.02.2018 16:27, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 04:02:31PM +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
>> 
>> ---
>>  net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c |    7 ++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
>> index 793b05e..95618eb 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
>> @@ -1380,9 +1380,14 @@ void sctp_init_addrs(struct sctp_chunk *chunk, union sctp_addr *src,
> 
> Weird how it identified sctp_init_addrs as the context here o.O
> Line numbers above and the rest below matches _sctp_make_chunk.

Looks like because of my old git version...

> 
>>  	struct sctp_chunk *retval;
>>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>>  	struct sock *sk;
>> +	int chunklen;
>> +
>> +	chunklen = sizeof(*chunk_hdr) + paylen;
> 
> It's better to do the padding here too, as it may grow the length by 3
> bytes.

Hmm, SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN is 65532 (accounts for padding by subtracting
sizeof(__u32) from 1 << 16) and SCTP_PAD4(65531) equals 65532, i.e. it
can't grow above it or am I missing something?

Agree, may be it's better to not rely on the particular constant value.
I'll send a new version.

Thanks,
Alexey

> 
>   Marcelo
> 
>> +	if (chunklen > SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN)
>> +		goto nodata;
>>  
>>  	/* No need to allocate LL here, as this is only a chunk. */
>> -	skb = alloc_skb(SCTP_PAD4(sizeof(*chunk_hdr) + paylen), gfp);
>> +	skb = alloc_skb(SCTP_PAD4(chunklen), gfp);
>>  	if (!skb)
>>  		goto nodata;
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>