[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180212153216.GB2153@nanopsycho>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:32:16 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Subject: Re: Fwd: u32 ht filters
Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:41:57PM CET, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
[...]
>>>@@ -348,7 +340,7 @@ static struct tc_u_common *tc_u_common_find(const
>>>struct tcf_proto *tp)
>>>
>>> h = tc_u_hash(tp);
>>> hlist_for_each_entry(tc, &tc_u_common_hash[h], hnode) {
>>>- if (tc->block == tp->chain->block)
>>>+ if (tc->block->q == tp->chain->block->q)
>>
>> :O I don't get it. tc->block is pointer, tc->block->q is pointer. And
>> they are different at the same time for non-shared block.
>
>If you look into Pawel's script, a new block is created for each class
>therefore a different tc_u_common is created which causes the
>ht 9:22 can't be found.
But wait. Originally this code looked like this:
static unsigned int tc_u_hash(const struct tcf_proto *tp)
{
struct net_device *dev = tp->q->dev_queue->dev;
u32 qhandle = tp->q->handle;
int ifindex = dev->ifindex;
return hash_64((u64)ifindex << 32 | qhandle, U32_HASH_SHIFT);
}
static struct tc_u_common *tc_u_common_find(const struct tcf_proto *tp)
{
struct tc_u_common *tc;
unsigned int h;
h = tc_u_hash(tp);
hlist_for_each_entry(tc, &tc_u_common_hash[h], hnode) {
if (tc->q == tp->q)
return tc;
}
return NULL;
}
That means that tc_u_common is identified according to tp->q. And that
is different for every class. How that could work? I'm properly confused.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists