[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180212.160510.620630476824737121.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:05:10 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/4] ipv4: fib_rules: support match on
sport, dport and ip proto
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:49:33 -0800
> Any setup with about 20 rules to be evaluated (per packet cost) will
> feel the pain...
>
> I wonder if we could JIT/eBPF this thing.
That's true for the software implementation angle.
But I bet anyone actually using this thing will get it hardware
offloaded.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists