[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180212.190328.237718184085028920.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 19:03:28 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/4] ipv4: fib_rules: support match on
sport, dport and ip proto
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:54:59 -0800
> We had project/teams using different routing tables for each vlan they
> setup :/
Indeed, people use FIB rules and think they can scale in software. As
currently implemented, they can't.
The example you give sounds possibly like a great VRF use case btw :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists