[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7da00869-2fb4-c4d2-f8da-26313c83178c@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:38:33 -0800
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, rds-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/7] rds: hold a sock ref from rds_message to
the rds_sock
On 2/14/2018 2:28 AM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> The existing model holds a reference from the rds_sock to the
> rds_message, but the rds_message does not itself hold a sock_put()
> on the rds_sock. Instead the m_rs field in the rds_message is
> assigned when the message is queued on the sock, and nulled when
> the message is dequeued from the sock.
>
> We want to be able to notify userspace when the rds_message
> is actually freed (from rds_message_purge(), after the refcounts
> to the rds_message go to 0). At the time that rds_message_purge()
> is called, the message is no longer on the rds_sock retransmit
> queue. Thus the explicit reference for the m_rs is needed to
> send a notification that will signal to userspace that
> it is now safe to free/reuse any pages that may have
> been pinned down for zerocopy.
>
> This patch manages the m_rs assignment in the rds_message with
> the necessary refcount book-keeping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
> ---
[...]
> @@ -756,9 +755,6 @@ void rds_send_drop_to(struct rds_sock *rs, struct sockaddr_in *dest)
> */
> if (!test_and_clear_bit(RDS_MSG_ON_CONN, &rm->m_flags)) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cp->cp_lock, flags);
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&rm->m_rs_lock, flags);
> - rm->m_rs = NULL;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rm->m_rs_lock, flags);
> continue;
> }
> list_del_init(&rm->m_conn_item);
This hunk was clearly wrong so good that you got rid of it as well.
Patch looks fine to me.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists