[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518643569155.7361@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:26:09 +0000
From: Thomas Winter <Thomas.Winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuznet@....inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: Use mark in skb by default
Hello David Miller,
Would this patch be able to be reverted? We have found in further testing that this produces undesired results.
For example, using some PBR rule that uses conntrack to set the skb->mark and the desired nexthop is a tunnel then the tunnel route selection hits a routing loop as the skb->mark is the mark of the encapsulated traffic and route selected by init_tunnel_flow is via tunnel itself.
Regards,
Thomas Winter
________________________________________
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Sent: 25 January 2018 10:31
To: Thomas Winter
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; kuznet@....inr.ac.ru; yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: Use mark in skb by default
From: Thomas Winter <Thomas.Winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:46:24 +1300
> This allows marks set by connmark in iptables
> to be used for route lookups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Winter <thomas.winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Applied to net-next, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists