[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180215105815.1fe9fed3@xeon-e3>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:58:15 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip: Use single variable to represent
-pretty
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:31:33 +0200
Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com> wrote:
> After commit a233caa0aaee ("json: make pretty printing optional") I get
> following build failure:
>
> LINK rtmon
> ../lib/libutil.a(json_print.o): In function `new_json_obj':
> json_print.c:(.text+0x35): undefined reference to `show_pretty'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [rtmon] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> It is caused by missing show_pretty variable in rtmon.
>
> On the other hand tc/tc.c there are two distinct variables and single
> matches() call that handles -pretty option thus setting show_pretty
> will never happen. Note that since commit 44dcfe820185 ("Change
> formatting of u32 back to default") show_pretty is used in tc/f_u32.c
> so this is first place where -pretty introduced.
>
> Furthermore other utilities like misc/ifstat.c and misc/nstat.c define
> pretty variable, however only for their own purposes. They both support
> JSON output and thus depend show_pretty in new_json_obj().
>
> Assuming above use common variable to represent -pretty option, define
> it in utils.c and declare in utils.h that is commonly used. Replace
> show_pretty with pretty.
>
> Fixes: a233caa0aaee ("json: make pretty printing optional")
> Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
> ---
Looks Good to me.
Not sure it did not show up in my builds.
I am fixing bridge to use similar json/color/pretty flags.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists