[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180215001926.4856-1-bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:19:26 +0900
From: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests/net: fixes psock_fanout eBPF test case
eBPF test fails due to verifier failure because log_buf is too small.
Fixed by increasing log_buf size
Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
---
v2: log_buf is statically allocated
tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c
index 989f917068d1..d4346b16b2c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ static void sock_fanout_getopts(int fd, uint16_t *typeflags, uint16_t *group_id)
static void sock_fanout_set_ebpf(int fd)
{
+ static char log_buf[65536];
+
const int len_off = __builtin_offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len);
struct bpf_insn prog[] = {
{ BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X, 6, 1, 0, 0 },
@@ -140,7 +142,6 @@ static void sock_fanout_set_ebpf(int fd)
{ BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
{ BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
};
- char log_buf[512];
union bpf_attr attr;
int pfd;
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists