[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180216.154656.1139171769823527545.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:46:56 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, petr@...drovec.name, fw@...len.de,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dn_getsockoptdecnet: move nf_{get/set}sockopt
outside sock lock
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:59:49 +0100
> After commit 3f34cfae1238 ("netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock lock
> only in the required scope"), the caller of nf_{get/set}sockopt() must
> not hold any lock, but, in such changeset, I forgot to cope with DECnet.
>
> This commit addresses the issue moving the nf call outside the lock,
> in the dn_{get,set}sockopt() with the same schema currently used by
> ipv4 and ipv6. Also moves the unhandled sockopts of the end of the main
> switch statements, to improve code readability.
>
> Reported-by: Petr Vandrovec <petr@...drovec.name>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198791#c2
> Fixes: 3f34cfae1238 ("netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock lock only in the required scope")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Applied, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists