netdev - Re: [PATCH] tun: fix mismatch in mutex lock-unlock in tun_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iLqG7+i5fPb+E8BXMth0dK8HeKXRp6Uh6gThCY8DWN=6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:44:27 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: fix mismatch in mutex lock-unlock in tun_get_user()

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Alexey Khoroshilov
<khoroshilov@...ras.ru> wrote:
> There is a single error path where tfile->napi_mutex is left unlocked.
> It can lead to a deadlock.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 81e6cc951e7f..0072a9832532 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1879,6 +1879,10 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>                         default:
>                                 this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_dropped);
>                                 kfree_skb(skb);
> +                               if (frags) {
> +                                       tfile->napi.skb = NULL;
> +                                       mutex_unlock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> +                               }
>                                 return -EINVAL;


I do not believe this can happen for IFF_TUN

IFF_NAPI_FRAGS can only be set for IFF_TAP