[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28e69707-9f10-451b-9218-8246238a9958@canonical.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 19:00:34 +0000
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i40evf: remove redundant array comparisons to 0 checks
On 18/02/18 16:31, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 16:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Colin Ian King
>> <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>>> On 16/02/18 16:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>>>>> + filter->f.mask.tcp_spec.dst_ip[i] |=
>>>>> cpu_to_be32(0xffffffff);
>>>>
>>>> Can it be one line then?
>>>
>>> I re-adjusted the text because checkpatch was complaining.
>>>>
>>>>> + filter->f.mask.tcp_spec.src_ip[i] |=
>>>>> cpu_to_be32(0xffffffff);
>>
>> For the rest OK, but for the above two how much over 80 it went if
>> would be one line?
>> If it 2-3 characters, consider to make it one line. It would increase
>> readability.
>
> Another possibility would be to use temporaries for
> filter->f.mask.tcp_spec
> and
> filter->f.data.tcp_spec
> as both are used ~10 times in the function
That's a good idea. I'll fix this up tomorrow when I get back to work
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists