[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518988012.55655.16.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 13:06:52 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Subject: Re: TCP and BBR: reproducibly low cwnd and bandwidth
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 13:04 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Can you please test the following patch ?
>
> Note that some cleanups can be done later in TCP stack, removing lots
> of legacy stuff.
>
> Also TCP internal-pacing could benefit from something similar to this
> fq patch eventually, although there is no hurry.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=fefa569a9d4bc4b7758c0fddd75bb0382c95da77
>
> Of course, you have to consider why SG was disabled on your device,
> this looks very pessimistic.
>
> Thanks !
>
> include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 1 +
> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Also note that the patch only deals with active connections.
My official patch will also take care of passive ones of course.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists