[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180219152746.GH5490@nataraja>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:27:46 +0100
From: Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: fw@...len.de, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] net: add bpfilter
Hi David,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:13:35AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> Florian, first of all, the whole "change the iptables binary" idea is
> a non-starter. For the many reasons I have described in the various
> postings I have made today.
>
> It is entirely impractical.
Why is it practical to replace your kernel but not practical to replace
a small userspace tool running on top of it?
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists