netdev - Re: [PATCH] rds: send: mark expected switch fall-through in rds_rm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66c0eda0-1863-4fb6-897c-c4e7abcdc344@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:09:44 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
Cc:     gustavo@...eddedor.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: send: mark expected switch fall-through in
 rds_rm_size



On 02/20/2018 12:01 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:54:09 -0800
> 
>> So coverity greps for commet as "fall through" for
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough build ?
> 
>  From what I understand, 'gcc' does in the latest versions.  Coverity
> might as well, I don't know.
> 

Yeah, the one that reports those warnings is GCC.

Coverity only knows about missing break, return and continue.

--
Gustavo