netdev - [patch net-next] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Allow port enslavement to a VLAN-unaware bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180220074512.4307-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:45:12 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: [patch net-next] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Allow port enslavement to a VLAN-unaware bridge

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>

Up until now we only allowed VLAN devices to be put in a VLAN-unaware
bridge, but some users need the ability to enslave physical ports as
well.

This is achieved by mapping the port and VID 1 to the bridge's vFID,
instead of the port and the VID used by the VLAN device.

The above is valid because as long as the port is not enslaved to a
bridge, VID 1 is guaranteed to be configured as PVID and egress
untagged.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
index f9f53af04fe1..917663adf925 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
@@ -1882,14 +1882,10 @@ mlxsw_sp_bridge_8021d_port_join(struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_device *bridge_device,
 				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	struct mlxsw_sp_port_vlan *mlxsw_sp_port_vlan;
+	struct net_device *dev = bridge_port->dev;
 	u16 vid;
 
-	if (!is_vlan_dev(bridge_port->dev)) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Only VLAN devices can be enslaved to a VLAN-unaware bridge");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-	vid = vlan_dev_vlan_id(bridge_port->dev);
-
+	vid = is_vlan_dev(dev) ? vlan_dev_vlan_id(dev) : 1;
 	mlxsw_sp_port_vlan = mlxsw_sp_port_vlan_find_by_vid(mlxsw_sp_port, vid);
 	if (WARN_ON(!mlxsw_sp_port_vlan))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1912,8 +1908,10 @@ mlxsw_sp_bridge_8021d_port_leave(struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_device *bridge_device,
 				 struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port)
 {
 	struct mlxsw_sp_port_vlan *mlxsw_sp_port_vlan;
-	u16 vid = vlan_dev_vlan_id(bridge_port->dev);
+	struct net_device *dev = bridge_port->dev;
+	u16 vid;
 
+	vid = is_vlan_dev(dev) ? vlan_dev_vlan_id(dev) : 1;
 	mlxsw_sp_port_vlan = mlxsw_sp_port_vlan_find_by_vid(mlxsw_sp_port, vid);
 	if (WARN_ON(!mlxsw_sp_port_vlan))
 		return;
-- 
2.14.3