| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180220163906.12380-14-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:39:00 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/19] netfilter: x_tables: use pr ratelimiting in matches/targets
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
all of these print simple error message - use single pr_ratelimit call.
checkpatch complains about lines > 80 but this would require splitting
several "literals" over multiple lines which is worse.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c | 17 +++++++++++------
net/netfilter/xt_addrtype.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
net/netfilter/xt_policy.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
index dd08cc1f86c7..9c75f419cd80 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
* the Free Software Foundation.
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/icmp.h>
@@ -312,15 +314,15 @@ hmark_tg_v4(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
static int hmark_tg_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
{
const struct xt_hmark_info *info = par->targinfo;
+ const char *errmsg = "proto mask must be zero with L3 mode";
if (!info->hmodulus)
return -EINVAL;
if (info->proto_mask &&
- (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_METHOD_L3))) {
- pr_info("xt_HMARK: proto mask must be zero with L3 mode\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_METHOD_L3)))
+ goto err;
+
if (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_SPI_MASK) &&
(info->flags & (XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_SPORT_MASK) |
XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_DPORT_MASK))))
@@ -329,10 +331,13 @@ static int hmark_tg_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
if (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_SPI) &&
(info->flags & (XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_SPORT) |
XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_DPORT)))) {
- pr_info("xt_HMARK: spi-set and port-set can't be combined\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "spi-set and port-set can't be combined";
+ goto err;
}
return 0;
+err:
+ pr_info_ratelimited("%s\n", errmsg);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static struct xt_target hmark_tg_reg[] __read_mostly = {
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_addrtype.c b/net/netfilter/xt_addrtype.c
index 911a7c0da504..89e281b3bfc2 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_addrtype.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_addrtype.c
@@ -164,48 +164,47 @@ addrtype_mt_v1(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
static int addrtype_mt_checkentry_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
+ const char *errmsg = "both incoming and outgoing interface limitation cannot be selected";
struct xt_addrtype_info_v1 *info = par->matchinfo;
if (info->flags & XT_ADDRTYPE_LIMIT_IFACE_IN &&
- info->flags & XT_ADDRTYPE_LIMIT_IFACE_OUT) {
- pr_info("both incoming and outgoing "
- "interface limitation cannot be selected\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ info->flags & XT_ADDRTYPE_LIMIT_IFACE_OUT)
+ goto err;
if (par->hook_mask & ((1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) |
(1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN)) &&
info->flags & XT_ADDRTYPE_LIMIT_IFACE_OUT) {
- pr_info("output interface limitation "
- "not valid in PREROUTING and INPUT\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "output interface limitation not valid in PREROUTING and INPUT";
+ goto err;
}
if (par->hook_mask & ((1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING) |
(1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT)) &&
info->flags & XT_ADDRTYPE_LIMIT_IFACE_IN) {
- pr_info("input interface limitation "
- "not valid in POSTROUTING and OUTPUT\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "input interface limitation not valid in POSTROUTING and OUTPUT";
+ goto err;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES)
if (par->family == NFPROTO_IPV6) {
if ((info->source | info->dest) & XT_ADDRTYPE_BLACKHOLE) {
- pr_err("ipv6 BLACKHOLE matching not supported\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "ipv6 BLACKHOLE matching not supported";
+ goto err;
}
if ((info->source | info->dest) >= XT_ADDRTYPE_PROHIBIT) {
- pr_err("ipv6 PROHIBIT (THROW, NAT ..) matching not supported\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "ipv6 PROHIBIT (THROW, NAT ..) matching not supported";
+ goto err;
}
if ((info->source | info->dest) & XT_ADDRTYPE_BROADCAST) {
- pr_err("ipv6 does not support BROADCAST matching\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "ipv6 does not support BROADCAST matching";
+ goto err;
}
}
#endif
return 0;
+err:
+ pr_info_ratelimited("%s\n", errmsg);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static struct xt_match addrtype_mt_reg[] __read_mostly = {
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_policy.c b/net/netfilter/xt_policy.c
index 5639fb03bdd9..13f8ccf946d6 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_policy.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_policy.c
@@ -132,26 +132,29 @@ policy_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
static int policy_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
const struct xt_policy_info *info = par->matchinfo;
+ const char *errmsg = "neither incoming nor outgoing policy selected";
+
+ if (!(info->flags & (XT_POLICY_MATCH_IN|XT_POLICY_MATCH_OUT)))
+ goto err;
- if (!(info->flags & (XT_POLICY_MATCH_IN|XT_POLICY_MATCH_OUT))) {
- pr_info("neither incoming nor outgoing policy selected\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
if (par->hook_mask & ((1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) |
(1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN)) && info->flags & XT_POLICY_MATCH_OUT) {
- pr_info("output policy not valid in PREROUTING and INPUT\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "output policy not valid in PREROUTING and INPUT";
+ goto err;
}
if (par->hook_mask & ((1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING) |
(1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT)) && info->flags & XT_POLICY_MATCH_IN) {
- pr_info("input policy not valid in POSTROUTING and OUTPUT\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "input policy not valid in POSTROUTING and OUTPUT";
+ goto err;
}
if (info->len > XT_POLICY_MAX_ELEM) {
- pr_info("too many policy elements\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ errmsg = "too many policy elements";
+ goto err;
}
return 0;
+err:
+ pr_info_ratelimited("%s\n", errmsg);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static struct xt_match policy_mt_reg[] __read_mostly = {
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists