lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180220163906.12380-2-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:38:48 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] netfilter: x_tables: remove size check

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

Back in 2002 vmalloc used to BUG on too large sizes.  We are much better
behaved these days and vmalloc simply returns NULL for those.  Remove the
check as it simply not needed and the comment is even misleading.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180131081916.GO21609@dhcp22.suse.cz
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
index 2f685ee1f9c8..97e06a04c0d4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
@@ -1004,10 +1004,6 @@ struct xt_table_info *xt_alloc_table_info(unsigned int size)
 	if (sz < sizeof(*info))
 		return NULL;
 
-	/* Pedantry: prevent them from hitting BUG() in vmalloc.c --RR */
-	if ((size >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 2 > totalram_pages)
-		return NULL;
-
 	/* __GFP_NORETRY is not fully supported by kvmalloc but it should
 	 * work reasonably well if sz is too large and bail out rather
 	 * than shoot all processes down before realizing there is nothing
-- 
2.11.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ