lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180221020137.o4vs2gy4utcue6nj@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:01:39 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        laforge@...filter.org, fw@...len.de, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] netfilter: nf_tables: add BPF-based jit
 infrastructure

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:53:55AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 01:53:34PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > I'm very suprised that this is generating classical BPF filters.
> >
> > We have native eBPF and that is what anything generating new code
> > should be using, rather than the 20+ year old CBPF.
> 
> I'm not the only one that likes 90s interfaces after all ;-)
> 
> I'll explore how to generate eBPF code in the next patchset version.

from the user space please...
it was already explained few times in this thread and in other
threads (kprobe, seccomp, etc related) over the last years why
it's not ok to generate eBPF from the kernel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ