netdev - Re: [PATCH net] tcp_bbr: better deal with suboptimal GSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iKpnHOWda1Lxj77eJYYQ7N-iZki_RQOkks7VVWyh-98Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:09:41 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp_bbr: better deal with suboptimal GSO

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Very minor nit, why don't:
>
>         return max_t(u32, bytes / mss_now, min_tso_segs);
>
> and drop the 'segs' local variable?

Simply to ease backports.

We had some constant changes in this function in the past.