[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de1b371c-52c7-3efd-f1fe-789b6cfa0085@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 01:44:02 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, anders.roxell@...aro.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: update gitignore with test_libbpf_open
On 02/22/2018 01:37 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/21/2018 05:33 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> Hi Shuah,
>>
>> On 02/22/2018 12:03 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2018 03:48 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
>>>> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:30:01 +0100
>>>>
>>>>> bpf builds a test program for loading BPF ELF files. Add the executable
>>>>> to the .gitignore list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>>
>>> Thanks. I will pull this in for 4.16-rc
>>
>> I would have taken this into bpf tree, but fair enough. This one
>> in particular doesn't cause any conflicts right now, so feel free
>> to pick it up then. But usual paths are via bpf / bpf-next as we
>> otherwise would run into real ugly merge conflicts.
>
> Daniel,
>
> Go for it. I know bpf tree stuff causes conflicts. That is why I usually
> stay away from bpfs selftests and let you handle them.
>
> You are taking the other one away, pick this up as well.
Okay, great, thanks for your understanding, Shuah. Just applied
to bpf tree.
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists