lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180222183038.GD1322@alphalink.fr>
Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:30:38 +0100
From:   Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ppp/pppoe, still panic 4.15.3 in ppp_push

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:04:30PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:01:16PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-15 17:55, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >> > > Here we go:
> >> > >
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.921549]
> >> > > ==================================================================
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.922167] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in
> >> > > ppp_ioctl+0xa6a/0x1522
> >> > > [ppp_generic]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.922776] Write of size 8 at addr ffff8803d35bf3f8 by task
> >> > > accel-pppd/12622
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.923113]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.923451] CPU: 0 PID: 12622 Comm: accel-pppd Tainted: G
> >> > > W
> >> > > 4.15.3-build-0134 #1
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.924058] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL320e Gen8 v2,
> >> > > BIOS P80
> >> > > 04/02/2015
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.924406] Call Trace:
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.924753]  dump_stack+0x46/0x59
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.925103]  print_address_description+0x6b/0x23b
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.925451]  ? ppp_ioctl+0xa6a/0x1522 [ppp_generic]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.925797]  kasan_report+0x21b/0x241
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.926136]  ppp_ioctl+0xa6a/0x1522 [ppp_generic]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.926479]  ? ppp_nl_newlink+0x1da/0x1da [ppp_generic]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.926829]  ? sock_sendmsg+0x89/0x99
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.927176]  ? __vfs_write+0xd9/0x4ad
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.927523]  ? kernel_read+0xed/0xed
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.927872]  ? SyS_getpeername+0x18c/0x18c
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.928213]  ? bit_waitqueue+0x2a/0x2a
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.928561]  ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x115/0x115
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.928898]  vfs_ioctl+0x6e/0x81
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.929228]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa00/0xb10
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.929571]  ? sigprocmask+0x1a6/0x1d0
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.929907]  ? sigsuspend+0x13e/0x13e
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.930239]  ? ioctl_preallocate+0x14e/0x14e
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.930568]  ? SyS_rt_sigprocmask+0xf1/0x142
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.930904]  ? sigprocmask+0x1d0/0x1d0
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.931252]  SyS_ioctl+0x39/0x55
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.931595]  ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xb10/0xb10
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.931942]  do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x31f
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.932288]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x21/0x86
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.932627] RIP: 0033:0x7f302849d8a7
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.932965] RSP: 002b:00007f3029a52af8 EFLAGS: 00000206
> >> > > ORIG_RAX:
> >> > > 0000000000000010
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.933578] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3027d861e3 RCX:
> >> > > 00007f302849d8a7
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.933927] RDX: 00007f3023f49468 RSI: 000000004004743a RDI:
> >> > > 0000000000003a67
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.934266] RBP: 00007f3029a52b20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> >> > > 000055c8308d8e40
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.934607] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
> >> > > 00007f3023f49358
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.934947] R13: 00007ffe86e5723f R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> >> > > 00007f3029a53700
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.935288]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.935626] Allocated by task 12622:
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.935972]  ppp_register_net_channel+0x5f/0x5c6
> >> > > [ppp_generic]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.936306]  pppoe_connect+0xab7/0xc71 [pppoe]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.936640]  SyS_connect+0x14b/0x1b7
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.936975]  do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x31f
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.937319]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x21/0x86
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.937655]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.937993] Freed by task 12622:
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.938321]  kfree+0xb0/0x11d
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.938658]  ppp_release+0x111/0x120 [ppp_generic]
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.938994]  __fput+0x2ba/0x51a
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.939332]  task_work_run+0x11c/0x13d
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.939676]  exit_to_usermode_loop+0x7c/0xaf
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.940022]  do_syscall_64+0x2ea/0x31f
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.940368]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x21/0x86
> >> > >  <srv> [24558.947099]
> >> >
> >> > Your first guess was right. It looks like we have an issue with
> >> > reference counting on the channels. Can you send me your ppp_generic.o?
> >> http://nuclearcat.com/ppp_generic.o
> >> Compiled with gcc version 6.4.0 (Gentoo 6.4.0-r1 p1.3)
> >>
> > From what I can see, ppp_release() and ioctl(PPPIOCCONNECT) are called
> > concurrently on the same ppp_file. Even if this ppp_file was pointed at
> > by two different file descriptors, I can't see how this could defeat
> > the reference counting mechanism. I'm going to think more about it.
> 
> For me it looks like pch->clist is not removed from the list ppp->channels
> when destroyed via ppp_release(). But I don't want to pretend I understand
> ppp logic.
> 
I've thought about that too, but couldn't find a scenario that could
trigger the bug.

To get ->private_data pointing to a struct channel pointer, a file needs
to ioctl(PPPIOCATTCHAN) first. For this call to succeed, the channel
must have been registered with ppp_register_net_channel(). Both
operations take a reference on the channel, which means that, before
adding pch->clist to a ppp->channels list (with ppp_connect_channel()),
the channel is already held by a /dev/ppp file and by the code that
registered the channel in the first place.

Therefore, closing the /dev/ppp file can't be enough to make
ppp_release() free the channel. We need to unregister the channel for
the refcount to drop to 0. And ppp_unregister_channel(), removes
pch->clist from ppp->channels before decrementing the reference
counter.

I'm simplifying a bit, and there could always be a race somewhere. But
I couldn't find anything so far.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ