lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4884253e-d29e-4a32-f764-6b90e10a2b4f@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:08:49 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, idosch@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: fib_rules: support for match on
 ip_proto, sport and dport

On 2/24/18 10:44 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> 
> uapi for ip_proto, sport and dport range match
> in fib rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> ---
>  include/net/fib_rules.h        | 31 +++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h |  8 ++++
>  net/core/fib_rules.c           | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/fib_rules.h b/include/net/fib_rules.h
> index b3d2162..6d99202 100644
> --- a/include/net/fib_rules.h
> +++ b/include/net/fib_rules.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@
>  #include <net/rtnetlink.h>
>  #include <net/fib_notifier.h>
>  
> +struct fib_port_range {
> +	__u16 start;
> +	__u16 end;

u16 for kernel headers; __u16 is for uapi.

> +};
> +
>  struct fib_kuid_range {
>  	kuid_t start;
>  	kuid_t end;
> @@ -27,7 +32,7 @@ struct fib_rule {
>  	u8			action;
>  	u8			l3mdev;
>  	u8                      proto;
> -	/* 1 byte hole, try to use */
> +	u8			ip_proto;
>  	u32			target;
>  	__be64			tun_id;
>  	struct fib_rule __rcu	*ctarget;
> @@ -40,6 +45,8 @@ struct fib_rule {
>  	char			iifname[IFNAMSIZ];
>  	char			oifname[IFNAMSIZ];
>  	struct fib_kuid_range	uid_range;
> +	struct fib_port_range	sport_range;
> +	struct fib_port_range	dport_range;
>  	struct rcu_head		rcu;
>  };
>  
> @@ -144,6 +151,28 @@ static inline u32 frh_get_table(struct fib_rule_hdr *frh, struct nlattr **nla)
>  	return frh->table;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool fib_rule_port_inrange(struct fib_port_range *a,
> +					 __be16 port)
> +{
> +	if (!a->start)
> +		return true;
> +	return ntohs(port) >= a->start &&
> +		ntohs(port) <= a->end;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool fib_rule_port_range_valid(const struct fib_port_range *a)
> +{
> +	return a->start > 0 && a->end < 0xffff &&
> +			a->start <= a->end;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool fib_rule_port_range_compare(struct fib_port_range *a,
> +					       struct fib_port_range *b)
> +{
> +	return a->start == b->start &&
> +		a->end == b->end;
> +}
> +
>  struct fib_rules_ops *fib_rules_register(const struct fib_rules_ops *,
>  					 struct net *);
>  void fib_rules_unregister(struct fib_rules_ops *);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h b/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> index 77d90ae..232df14 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct fib_rule_uid_range {
>  	__u32		end;
>  };
>  
> +struct fib_rule_port_range {
> +	__u16		start;
> +	__u16		end;
> +};
> +
>  enum {
>  	FRA_UNSPEC,
>  	FRA_DST,	/* destination address */
> @@ -59,6 +64,9 @@ enum {
>  	FRA_L3MDEV,	/* iif or oif is l3mdev goto its table */
>  	FRA_UID_RANGE,	/* UID range */
>  	FRA_PROTOCOL,   /* Originator of the rule */
> +	FRA_IP_PROTO,	/* ip proto */
> +	FRA_SPORT_RANGE, /* sport */
> +	FRA_DPORT_RANGE, /* dport */
>  	__FRA_MAX
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/net/core/fib_rules.c b/net/core/fib_rules.c
> index a6aea80..5008235 100644
> --- a/net/core/fib_rules.c
> +++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ bool fib_rule_matchall(const struct fib_rule *rule)
>  	if (!uid_eq(rule->uid_range.start, fib_kuid_range_unset.start) ||
>  	    !uid_eq(rule->uid_range.end, fib_kuid_range_unset.end))
>  		return false;
> +	if (fib_rule_port_range_valid(&rule->sport_range))
> +		return false;
> +	if (fib_rule_port_range_valid(&rule->dport_range))
> +		return false;

Seems like that should be a check that start and end are both not 0.
Given the uses of fib_rule_port_range_valid, perhaps another helper is
needed to make this more readable -- e.g., fib_rule_port_range_set --
which would be used here and fill_rule.


>  	return true;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fib_rule_matchall);
> @@ -221,6 +225,12 @@ static int nla_put_uid_range(struct sk_buff *skb, struct fib_kuid_range *range)
>  	return nla_put(skb, FRA_UID_RANGE, sizeof(out), &out);
>  }
>  
> +static int nla_put_port_range(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype,
> +			      struct fib_port_range *range)
> +{
> +	return nla_put(skb, attrtype, sizeof(*range), range);
> +}
> +
>  static int fib_rule_match(struct fib_rule *rule, struct fib_rules_ops *ops,
>  			  struct flowi *fl, int flags,
>  			  struct fib_lookup_arg *arg)
> @@ -425,6 +435,17 @@ static int rule_exists(struct fib_rules_ops *ops, struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
>  		    !uid_eq(r->uid_range.end, rule->uid_range.end))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (r->ip_proto != rule->ip_proto)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!fib_rule_port_range_compare(&r->sport_range,
> +						 &rule->sport_range))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!fib_rule_port_range_compare(&r->dport_range,
> +						 &rule->dport_range))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (!ops->compare(r, frh, tb))
>  			continue;
>  		return 1;
> @@ -432,6 +453,20 @@ static int rule_exists(struct fib_rules_ops *ops, struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int nla_get_port_range(struct nlattr *pattr,
> +			      struct fib_port_range *port_range)
> +{
> +	const struct fib_port_range *pr = nla_data(pattr);

Isn't the data struct from userspace fib_rule_port_range? that begs the
question of whether a separate struct definition is needed for kernel
side. Why not just use the one for both?


> +
> +	if (!fib_rule_port_range_valid(pr))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	port_range->start = pr->start;
> +	port_range->end = pr->end;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int fib_nl_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  		   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
> @@ -569,6 +604,23 @@ int fib_nl_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  		rule->uid_range = fib_kuid_range_unset;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (tb[FRA_IP_PROTO])
> +		rule->ip_proto = nla_get_u8(tb[FRA_IP_PROTO]);
> +
> +	if (tb[FRA_SPORT_RANGE]) {
> +		err = nla_get_port_range(tb[FRA_SPORT_RANGE],
> +					 &rule->sport_range);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto errout_free;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[FRA_DPORT_RANGE]) {
> +		err = nla_get_port_range(tb[FRA_DPORT_RANGE],
> +					 &rule->dport_range);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto errout_free;
> +	}
> +
>  	if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) &&
>  	    rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) {
>  		err = -EEXIST;
> @@ -638,6 +690,8 @@ int fib_nl_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  	struct fib_rule *rule, *r;
>  	struct nlattr *tb[FRA_MAX+1];
>  	struct fib_kuid_range range;
> +	struct fib_port_range *sprange = NULL;
> +	struct fib_port_range *dprange = NULL;
>  	int err = -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*frh)))
> @@ -667,6 +721,22 @@ int fib_nl_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  		range = fib_kuid_range_unset;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (tb[FRA_SPORT_RANGE]) {
> +		sprange = nla_data(tb[FRA_SPORT_RANGE]);
> +		if (!fib_rule_port_range_valid(sprange)) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto errout;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[FRA_DPORT_RANGE]) {
> +		dprange = nla_data(tb[FRA_DPORT_RANGE]);
> +		if (!fib_rule_port_range_valid(dprange)) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto errout;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(rule, &ops->rules_list, list) {
>  		if (tb[FRA_PROTOCOL] &&
>  		    (rule->proto != nla_get_u8(tb[FRA_PROTOCOL])))
> @@ -712,6 +782,18 @@ int fib_nl_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  		     !uid_eq(rule->uid_range.end, range.end)))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (tb[FRA_IP_PROTO] &&
> +		    (rule->ip_proto != nla_get_u8(tb[FRA_IP_PROTO])))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (sprange &&
> +		    !fib_rule_port_range_compare(&rule->sport_range, sprange))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (dprange &&
> +		    !fib_rule_port_range_compare(&rule->dport_range, dprange))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (!ops->compare(rule, frh, tb))
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -790,7 +872,10 @@ static inline size_t fib_rule_nlmsg_size(struct fib_rules_ops *ops,
>  			 + nla_total_size(4) /* FRA_FWMASK */
>  			 + nla_total_size_64bit(8) /* FRA_TUN_ID */
>  			 + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct fib_kuid_range))
> -			 + nla_total_size(1); /* FRA_PROTOCOL */
> +			 + nla_total_size(1) /* FRA_PROTOCOL */
> +			 + nla_total_size(1) /* FRA_IP_PROTO */
> +			 + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct fib_port_range)) /* FRA_SPORT_RANGE */
> +			 + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct fib_port_range)); /* FRA_DPORT_RANGE */
>  
>  	if (ops->nlmsg_payload)
>  		payload += ops->nlmsg_payload(rule);
> @@ -855,7 +940,12 @@ static int fib_nl_fill_rule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct fib_rule *rule,
>  	    (rule->l3mdev &&
>  	     nla_put_u8(skb, FRA_L3MDEV, rule->l3mdev)) ||
>  	    (uid_range_set(&rule->uid_range) &&
> -	     nla_put_uid_range(skb, &rule->uid_range)))
> +	     nla_put_uid_range(skb, &rule->uid_range)) ||
> +	    (fib_rule_port_range_valid(&rule->sport_range) &&
> +	     nla_put_port_range(skb, FRA_SPORT_RANGE, &rule->sport_range)) ||
> +	    (fib_rule_port_range_valid(&rule->dport_range) &&
> +	     nla_put_port_range(skb, FRA_DPORT_RANGE, &rule->dport_range)) ||
> +	    (rule->ip_proto && nla_put_u8(skb, FRA_IP_PROTO, rule->ip_proto)))
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
>  
>  	if (rule->suppress_ifgroup != -1) {
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ