netdev - Re: [patch net-next] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Allow port enslavement to a VLAN-unaware bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8edd493-f141-cff1-917a-ef69ee6bbca6@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:08:33 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Allow port
 enslavement to a VLAN-unaware bridge

On 2/20/18 12:45 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> 
> Up until now we only allowed VLAN devices to be put in a VLAN-unaware
> bridge, but some users need the ability to enslave physical ports as
> well.
> 
> This is achieved by mapping the port and VID 1 to the bridge's vFID,
> instead of the port and the VID used by the VLAN device.
> 
> The above is valid because as long as the port is not enslaved to a
> bridge, VID 1 is guaranteed to be configured as PVID and egress
> untagged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

Tested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>