netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sh_eth: TSU_QTAG0/1 registers the same as TSU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180226.135812.1342671817131564676.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:58:12 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sh_eth: TSU_QTAG0/1 registers the same as
 TSU_QTAGM0/1

From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:28:16 +0300

> The TSU_QTAG0/1 registers found in the Gigabit Ether controllers actually
> have the same long name  as the TSU_QTAGM0/1 registers in the early Ether
> controllers:  Qtag Addition/Deletion Set Register (Port 0/1 to 1/0); thus
> there's no need to make a difference in sh_eth_tsu_init() between those
> controllers. Unfortunately, we can't just remove TSU_QTAG0/1 from the
> register *enum* because that would break the ethtool register dump...
> 
> Fixes: b0ca2a21f769 ("sh_eth: Add support of SH7763 to sh_eth")
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>

Applied.