[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180226105822.ax6zc4gakhifgxzc@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:58:24 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DT: net: renesas,ravb: document R8A77980 bindings
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:53:17PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:01:15 +0300
>
> > On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >
> >> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB
> >> device, so document the SoC specific bindings.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's
> >> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-)
> >
> > David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because
> > it was posted during the merge window?
>
> No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere
> DT update.
Hi Dave,
I am happy to take these kinds of changes for the ravb and sh_eth drivers
if that is your preference. I am also just as happy for you to take them,
which I think has been the case for similar changes in the past.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists