[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f43312d5-1c22-71fe-7c47-a5eb1cf19d09@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:32 +0200
From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
To: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@...ia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Fix compilation with kernel headers < 3.4
Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Serhey Popovych wrote:
>> Since commit 596b1c94aa38e21b7a8c8562e8b61ccb744255d2, iproute2 uses types
>> __kernel_long_t and __kernel_ulong_t but does not provide internal
>> definitions for it.
>>
>> This means that compilation using kernel headers that are older than 3.4
>> (where these types were added) will fail. This situation may be uncommon for
>> native compilation, but not uncommon for cross compilation where the
>> toolchains may be a bit older.
>>
>> Provide the necessary types internally if not provided by the kernel
>> headers to fix compilation in such cases.
>>
>> Co-Developed-by: Serhii Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@...ia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sysinfo.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> misc/ss.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/sysinfo.h
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sysinfo.h b/include/linux/sysinfo.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..766de8d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/sysinfo.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +#ifndef _SYSINFO_COMPAT_H
>> +#define _SYSINFO_COMPAT_H
>> +
>> +/* In case the kernel header asm/posix_types.h is too old (< 3.4) to provide
>> + * __kernel_long_t, provide it here
>> + */
>> +#ifndef __kernel_long_t
>> +typedef long __kernel_long_t;
>> +typedef unsigned long __kernel_ulong_t;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#include_next <linux/sysinfo.h>
>> +
>> +#endif /* _SYSINFO_COMPAT_H */
>
> Actually, I now wonder: instead of applying this trick with #include_next on
> sysinfo.h, why not do it on linux/types.h ? That would be more correct and more
> robust for the future, no?
No. Headers in include/uapi updated automatically from newer kernel
versions. If we do any hacks in iproute2 uapi directory updating headers
automatically would be problematic.
As for me using #include_next presents better approach.
Better to provide means for compatibility and that I propose to do with
series "ip: Provide compatibility bits to build with old glibc/kernel
headers".
>
> /Thomas
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists